This website is basically just to post these links

---

If my twitter said that ive never tweeted, screen recording of what my twitter and other twitters look like (mine doesnt load, others do):

https://youtube.com/shorts/MMPKFDZ7_dQ?si=fjlUZcewenVF6zU6

Screen recording from 1/14or15/26:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WtpGUp-tTISiFSB_LgibI4sI_6TPBYDL/view?usp=drivesdk

My book, The Evolution of Complex Dynamic Systems: Manifestations of Pseudodirected Pseudorandomness, is an explaination of what i learned fixing an a.i capable of interacting with complex dynamic systems as they interact based on understanding of manifestations of mechanistic complexity in a manner that demonstrates the rest of human understanding to be purely corrolation based. A laptop not understanding manifestations of mechanisms based on what they physically are could easily be made to believe that people like the taste of shit, and when told someone ate shit, would believe they had a good meal. A person who believed someone who said that shit tasted good taking a bite, as a result of evolutionarily derived pseudodirected pseudorandomly aligned mechanisms would quickly manifest feelings of 'nope, shits not delicious. Shits disgusting'. At best, laptops blindly reference human limited (essentially word-based) approximation of functional understanding of relationships between anecdotes, even when the variables appear adequately coded. I argue that the only valid foundation for claims of legal ability is the good faith coordination of self defense resulting from the same evolutionary mechanisms that underlie physics and chemistry, based on the fact that if an argument is internally inconsistent and/or if an argument uses invalid foundations, its invalid. If you believe A and A says that 1+1 equals 2 and 3, whether it equals 2 or 3 isnt even really pertinent, because it cant equal both. No matter how many steps removed from an invalid foundation, an argument attempts to reference an entire reality, not just the referenced anecdote. Any invalid foundation makes the entire argument invalid, as its referencing a false reality in which something that isnt is. If an invalid foundation of 1+1=3 is used as an early step in a million step equation, the impressiveness of the rest of the math is superfluous, the mathematical argument would be invalid. 

(Whats actually happening:)

My book with new pre-preface (should be readable as .pdf on other tab of this website without pre-preface):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z-cFrrOeVIbb1_cjb0BjeQqAA1727ccF/view?usp=drivesdk

..and what the twitter looks like when it loads (link outdated, as of now (11/28/25), the pinned tweet is to a thread about me accusing the u.s before the AP article, then warning a new member of the u.s legislature of fhe difference between politics as a fight and when viewed as a game, an explanation of why cops doing their job is more systemically important than whether or not criminals exist, references to the 212-208 vote, 2 simple drawings,  then a tweet explaining that while at first, a recent NYtimes article made me feel kind of bad for matt gaetz brcause it said the girl said she was 18, that prostitution is illegal, meaning he took on the burdens of verifying her age, and that as a member of congress, if anyone should have understood that prostitution being illegal was about protecting the vulnerable, it was them, but instead: 

"A CONGRESSMAN PAID A CHILD TO FUCK THEM ON A POOL TABLE IN THE MIDDLE OF A PARTY, AND THE CHILD, HOMELESS AND IN NEED OF BRACES, OBLIGED."

Then moonbears... braindamage...space war...  the govt calling it alien mind control to your stupid fucking face.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Zj67xubEaq9rwMcibw80Ilm32TcayXO/view?usp=drivesdk